I think that all that talk about "the law" is just empty demagoguery by the corrupt media and corrupt courts. All those amendments, "threatened" changes of the "laws," etc. There is no difference because whenever those criminals want, they - the courts themselves - simply disregard the law, misapply it, lie about it, and pervert the facts and procedure. All that "law" is just one endless lie because it is almost never applied truthfully, impartially, and honestly.
Do you know of a video editing tool that does NOT censor? I literally tried at least a dozen, and all "disallow" me to use their services/tools/editors.
I was fired up by the recent spate of rhetoric including the phrase "rule of law" and mused to myself that maybe we have not been educated to know what that phrase really means. I looked into it a bit... here is what I found:
YES--and what a major article you have posted there--thank you for sharing this, I feel everyone needs to read it!!! Let me paste in the comment I made below your article which I just read:
**What an immense and major article!!! Frances thank you for posting this and please consider coming and doing a Report on this at my channel. I see the AFI/AIM has also been covering similar subjects lately, I need to catch up on their research too, and so has Janet Ossebaard (Sequel to the Fall of the Cabal). I think I learned from Anna von Reitz's Sign-In America course (which I took a month or so ago when I changed my status to American State National) that "rule of law" meant "rules and procedures of the Court" which she explains I think is the Court in Admiralty Law or court in commerce, but now I see what Court that really is, since the entire US judicial system, by this disclosure, belongs to the Crown Temple and Rome.
This also explains why, when you go to visit the National Archives in Washington DC and go in to the circular room which houses copies of the US Constitution, you see the manuscripts laid out in large flat-topped glass cabinets with gold-cover frames on which are embossed the heads of Roman kings or senators, with that famous olive wreath motif strung down below them as well--no photos or cameras or cells are allowed in that room so I could not snapshot this but it struck me as inordinately strange. I see now why that is. It is a way of the Crown Temple/Papal types to establish symbolically and visually that the US Constitution--and US--is theirs.
I'm hoping that what Anna von Reitz has done to reclaim USA for Americans goes beyond this power grab by the Crown Templars. Also, please check out my conver with John: Wanoa and Andrew: Devine where John explains "King's Bench" authority and how ancient means of establishing authority had to do with Moais (memorials) and such -- another complex subject I'm still trying to understand -- he too was saying the entire Windsor clan and Queen Victoria prior did not really have authority to rule and there was some transfer via the King's line which may or may not have something to do with King John and the Magna Carta. I recall he talked of William Orange and went back to the 1600s, I will have to follow his work more, hazy on the details.
But this is a major article and major information--thank you for unearthing it and sharing it!**
Thank you for approving! It was pure luck that I stumbled upon the source document.... or was it synchronicity? Much love as ever! Of course we can chat about whatever you like, any time! We need a fresh chin wag every once in a while. I think we are learning a lot very rapidly and we should recap - especially the significant stuff like "the rule of law" - sneaky people really deserve revelation! We would be doing the ethical thing but won't be appreciated for it within our lifetimes..... good job I believe in reincarnation, huh? xx
Oh....you are definitely appreciated Frances! Millions should be reading your work (and mine:) And who knows, maybe they are! (We're just not being told;) Yes, a regular check-in and sharing of what we learn will be fantastic. Let me email you with a couple dates for a show soon....Much love and so Glad for what you do!!!
I think that all that talk about "the law" is just empty demagoguery by the corrupt media and corrupt courts. All those amendments, "threatened" changes of the "laws," etc. There is no difference because whenever those criminals want, they - the courts themselves - simply disregard the law, misapply it, lie about it, and pervert the facts and procedure. All that "law" is just one endless lie because it is almost never applied truthfully, impartially, and honestly.
Yes, they don't keep their own "laws" -- complete lawless Amerika at this point.
Hi, Ramola,
Sorry for off topic -
Do you know of a video editing tool that does NOT censor? I literally tried at least a dozen, and all "disallow" me to use their services/tools/editors.
I was fired up by the recent spate of rhetoric including the phrase "rule of law" and mused to myself that maybe we have not been educated to know what that phrase really means. I looked into it a bit... here is what I found:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/what-does-the-rule-of-law-mean?s=w
Upshot is:
We are enslaved by a modern law corporation which has its roots in Crusader Catholicism and the Templars based in the City of London.
YES--and what a major article you have posted there--thank you for sharing this, I feel everyone needs to read it!!! Let me paste in the comment I made below your article which I just read:
**What an immense and major article!!! Frances thank you for posting this and please consider coming and doing a Report on this at my channel. I see the AFI/AIM has also been covering similar subjects lately, I need to catch up on their research too, and so has Janet Ossebaard (Sequel to the Fall of the Cabal). I think I learned from Anna von Reitz's Sign-In America course (which I took a month or so ago when I changed my status to American State National) that "rule of law" meant "rules and procedures of the Court" which she explains I think is the Court in Admiralty Law or court in commerce, but now I see what Court that really is, since the entire US judicial system, by this disclosure, belongs to the Crown Temple and Rome.
This also explains why, when you go to visit the National Archives in Washington DC and go in to the circular room which houses copies of the US Constitution, you see the manuscripts laid out in large flat-topped glass cabinets with gold-cover frames on which are embossed the heads of Roman kings or senators, with that famous olive wreath motif strung down below them as well--no photos or cameras or cells are allowed in that room so I could not snapshot this but it struck me as inordinately strange. I see now why that is. It is a way of the Crown Temple/Papal types to establish symbolically and visually that the US Constitution--and US--is theirs.
I'm hoping that what Anna von Reitz has done to reclaim USA for Americans goes beyond this power grab by the Crown Templars. Also, please check out my conver with John: Wanoa and Andrew: Devine where John explains "King's Bench" authority and how ancient means of establishing authority had to do with Moais (memorials) and such -- another complex subject I'm still trying to understand -- he too was saying the entire Windsor clan and Queen Victoria prior did not really have authority to rule and there was some transfer via the King's line which may or may not have something to do with King John and the Magna Carta. I recall he talked of William Orange and went back to the 1600s, I will have to follow his work more, hazy on the details.
But this is a major article and major information--thank you for unearthing it and sharing it!**
Thank you for approving! It was pure luck that I stumbled upon the source document.... or was it synchronicity? Much love as ever! Of course we can chat about whatever you like, any time! We need a fresh chin wag every once in a while. I think we are learning a lot very rapidly and we should recap - especially the significant stuff like "the rule of law" - sneaky people really deserve revelation! We would be doing the ethical thing but won't be appreciated for it within our lifetimes..... good job I believe in reincarnation, huh? xx
Oh....you are definitely appreciated Frances! Millions should be reading your work (and mine:) And who knows, maybe they are! (We're just not being told;) Yes, a regular check-in and sharing of what we learn will be fantastic. Let me email you with a couple dates for a show soon....Much love and so Glad for what you do!!!